<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Experiment in Twitter-Ology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theorynpractice.com/2009/12/01/an-experiment-in-twitter-ology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theorynpractice.com/2009/12/01/an-experiment-in-twitter-ology/</link>
	<description>Where we make meaning of everything.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 00:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.G. Smith</title>
		<link>http://theorynpractice.com/2009/12/01/an-experiment-in-twitter-ology/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>B.G. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theorynpractice.com/?p=152#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Hey Spencer, you raise some great issues. In fact, the whole idea of affiliating identity with a market product has been widely explored, researched, debated, and discussed. I&#039;d recommend Kevin Lane Keller who has produced some excellent work on the subject. Frankly, I think that people self-select and associate themselves with a brand...which relates to your point on democratization of labeling. I think brands become a way to represent what individuals already feel inside and want to express, but have no other way of expressing it than to find a connection in something that is public like Twilight. I think it&#039;s an age-old phenomenon, people associate themselves with what &quot;rings true&quot; to them, and branding builds off of that. Rather than making a product that people have to fit into, marketers spend loads of resources researching their relevant audiences, finding out their needs, then meeting those needs through branding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Spencer, you raise some great issues. In fact, the whole idea of affiliating identity with a market product has been widely explored, researched, debated, and discussed. I&#8217;d recommend Kevin Lane Keller who has produced some excellent work on the subject. Frankly, I think that people self-select and associate themselves with a brand&#8230;which relates to your point on democratization of labeling. I think brands become a way to represent what individuals already feel inside and want to express, but have no other way of expressing it than to find a connection in something that is public like Twilight. I think it&#8217;s an age-old phenomenon, people associate themselves with what &#8220;rings true&#8221; to them, and branding builds off of that. Rather than making a product that people have to fit into, marketers spend loads of resources researching their relevant audiences, finding out their needs, then meeting those needs through branding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer G</title>
		<link>http://theorynpractice.com/2009/12/01/an-experiment-in-twitter-ology/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theorynpractice.com/?p=152#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Your final questions treat the main thought I had reading this, that twittering especially, but also facebook updates, lend themselves towards labeling. Something that is historically seen as very negative. This &quot;democratization&quot; of labeling may be seen as empowering--people taking control of their own brand--but then again, what does it mean that the way people exercise that freedom (and this may not be the majority of people, but I&#039;m do think it&#039;s a significant amount) to merely affiliate with a market product? Though I guess it&#039;s no surprise that marketing has integrated into ideas of identity. I&#039;ve heard many Mac users refer to the &quot;lifestyle&quot; they&#039;ve purchased... though not in those exact terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your final questions treat the main thought I had reading this, that twittering especially, but also facebook updates, lend themselves towards labeling. Something that is historically seen as very negative. This &#8220;democratization&#8221; of labeling may be seen as empowering&#8211;people taking control of their own brand&#8211;but then again, what does it mean that the way people exercise that freedom (and this may not be the majority of people, but I&#8217;m do think it&#8217;s a significant amount) to merely affiliate with a market product? Though I guess it&#8217;s no surprise that marketing has integrated into ideas of identity. I&#8217;ve heard many Mac users refer to the &#8220;lifestyle&#8221; they&#8217;ve purchased&#8230; though not in those exact terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
